Difference between revisions of "Equations of General Relativity"

From Universe in Problems
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 49: Line 49:
 
   <div class="NavHead">solution</div>
 
   <div class="NavHead">solution</div>
 
   <div style="width:100%;" class="NavContent">
 
   <div style="width:100%;" class="NavContent">
     <p style="text-align: left;"></p>
+
     <p style="text-align: left;">Let us consider a locally flat reference frame, in which the metric tensor at a given point equals to $\eta_{\mu\nu}=diag(1,-1,-1,-1)$. If the observer in this frame has physical velocity $\mathbf{v}$, then we add a boost with the parameter $\mathbf{v}$, so in the resulting frame both the metric is locally flat and the observer is at rest, with 4-velocity equal to $u^{\mu}=(1,0,0,0)$. Let the photon in this  frame have $4$-wave vector $k_{\mu}=(\omega,-\vec{k})$. Then the observer registers its frequency  $\omega$ equal to
 +
\begin{equation}\label{equ_OmegaDet}
 +
\omega=u^{\mu}k_{\mu}.
 +
\end{equation}
 +
But being scalar, the expression (\ref{equ_OmegaDet}) is valid in any other reference frame. The same way one obtains that the registered momentum of a particle is $u^{\mu}p_{\mu}$.</p>
 
   </div>
 
   </div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 67: Line 71:
 
   <div class="NavHead">solution</div>
 
   <div class="NavHead">solution</div>
 
   <div style="width:100%;" class="NavContent">
 
   <div style="width:100%;" class="NavContent">
     <p style="text-align: left;"></p>
+
     <p style="text-align: left;">The action of covariant derivative on a tensor of rank $(0,2)$ is defined as
 +
\[\nabla_{\lambda}T_{\mu\nu}=
 +
\partial_{\lambda}T_{\mu\nu}
 +
-{\Gamma^{\rho}}_{\mu\lambda}T_{\rho\nu}
 +
-{\Gamma^{\rho}}_{\lambda\nu}T_{\mu\rho}.\]
 +
 
 +
We express the metric compatibility condition $\nabla_{\lambda}g_{\mu\nu}=0$ in terms of ${\Gamma^{\lambda}}_{\mu\nu}$ and make cyclic transpositions of indices to obtain
 +
\[\begin{array}{l}
 +
0=\partial_{\lambda}g_{\mu\nu}-
 +
\Gamma^{\rho}_{\mu\lambda}g_{\rho\nu}-
 +
\Gamma^{\rho}_{\nu\lambda}g_{\mu\rho};\\
 +
0=\partial_{\mu}g_{\nu\lambda}-
 +
\Gamma^{\rho}_{\nu\mu}g_{\rho\lambda}-
 +
\Gamma^{\rho}_{\lambda\mu}g_{\nu\rho};\\
 +
0=\partial_{\nu}g_{\lambda\mu}-
 +
\Gamma^{\rho}_{\lambda\nu}g_{\rho\mu}-
 +
\Gamma^{\rho}_{\mu\nu}g_{\lambda\rho};
 +
\end{array}\quad\Rightarrow\quad
 +
\begin{array}{l}
 +
\partial_{\lambda}g_{\mu\nu}=
 +
\Gamma^{\rho}_{\mu\lambda}g_{\rho\nu}+
 +
\Gamma^{\rho}_{\nu\lambda}g_{\mu\rho};\\
 +
\partial_{\mu}g_{\nu\lambda}=
 +
\Gamma^{\rho}_{\nu\mu}g_{\rho\lambda}+
 +
\Gamma^{\rho}_{\lambda\mu}g_{\nu\rho};\\
 +
\partial_{\nu}g_{\lambda\mu}=
 +
\Gamma^{\rho}_{\lambda\nu}g_{\rho\mu}+
 +
\Gamma^{\rho}_{\mu\nu}g_{\lambda\rho}\;.
 +
\end{array}.\]
 +
Adding all the three equalities with signs $-++$, and taking into account the symmetry of ${\Gamma^{\lambda}}_{\mu\nu}$, we are led to
 +
\begin{equation}\label{GammaTorsion}
 +
\partial_{\mu}g_{\lambda\nu}+
 +
\partial_{\nu}g_{\lambda\mu}
 +
-\partial_{\lambda}g_{\mu\nu}
 +
=2g_{\lambda\rho}\Gamma^{\rho}_{\mu\nu},
 +
\end{equation}
 +
and contracting this with $g^{\sigma\lambda}$, we finally  get
 +
\begin{equation}\label{GammaChristoffel}
 +
\Gamma^{\sigma}_{\mu\nu}=
 +
{\textstyle\frac{1}{2}}\; g^{\sigma\lambda}
 +
\Big(\partial_{\mu}g_{\lambda\nu}+
 +
\partial_{\nu}g_{\lambda\mu}
 +
-\partial_{\lambda}g_{\mu\nu}\Big).
 +
\end{equation}</p>
 
   </div>
 
   </div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 78: Line 125:
 
   <div class="NavHead">solution</div>
 
   <div class="NavHead">solution</div>
 
   <div style="width:100%;" class="NavContent">
 
   <div style="width:100%;" class="NavContent">
     <p style="text-align: left;"></p>
+
     <p style="text-align: left;">We use here the shortened notation: transfer the prime that denotes components of a tensorial quantity in the primed frame of reference to the indices ${A'}_{\nu}\equiv A_{\nu'}$, ${x'}^{m}\equiv x^{m'}$, and denote derivatives with a comma $\partial_{\mu}{T^{\ldots}}_{\ldots}={T^{\ldots}}_{\ldots\,,\mu}$ and semicolon $\nabla_{\mu}{T^{\ldots}}_{\ldots}={T^{\ldots}}_{\ldots\,;\mu}$.
 +
 
 +
The transformation rule for ${\Gamma^{\mu}}_{\nu\lambda}$ is fixed by the condition that for arbitrary vector $A_\mu$ its covariant derivative $A_{\mu;\nu}$ is a tensor:
 +
\begin{align*}
 +
A_{i';k'}=&
 +
{x^m}_{,i'}{x^n}_{,k'}A_{m;n}=
 +
{x^m}_{,i'}{x^n}_{,k'}
 +
\left({A_{m}}_{,n}-
 +
{\Gamma^{p}}_{mn}A_{p}\right)=\\
 +
&={x^m}_{,i'}{x^n}_{,k'}{A_{m}}_{,n}-
 +
{x^m}_{,i'}{x^n}_{,k'}\;
 +
{\Gamma^{p}}_{mn}A_{p}\;;\\
 +
A_{i';k'}=&A_{i',k'}-{\Gamma^{p'}}_{i'k'}A_{p'}=
 +
\left({x^{j}}_{,i'}A_{j}\right)_{,k'}-
 +
{\Gamma^{p'}}_{i'k'}\;{x^{q}}_{,p'}A_{q}=\\
 +
&={x^{j}}_{,i',k'}A_{j}+{x^{j}}_{,i'}{x^{n}}_{,k'}A_{j\,,n}-
 +
{\Gamma^{p'}}_{i'k'}\;{x^{q}}_{,p'}A_{q}=\\
 +
&={x^{p}}_{,i',k'}A_{p}+
 +
{x^{m}}_{,i'}{{x^{n}}_{,k'}}A_{m\,,n}-
 +
{x^{p}}_{,q'}{\Gamma^{q'}}_{i'k'}\;A_{p}.
 +
\end{align*}
 +
Equating the right hand sides and taking into account that  $A^\mu$ is arbitrary, we have
 +
\[{x^p}_{,q'}{\Gamma^{q'}}_{i'k'}=
 +
{x^{m}}_{,i'}{x^{n}}_{,k'}\;{\Gamma^{p}}_{mn}A_{p}
 +
+{x^{p}}_{,i',k'}.\]
 +
Contracting with ${x^{j'}}_{,p}$ and taking into account that ${x^{j'}}_{,p}{x^{p}}_{,q'}=\delta^{j'}_{q'}$, we finally get
 +
\begin{equation}\label{GammaTranform}
 +
{\Gamma^{j'}}_{i'k'}={x^{p}}_{,i',k'}\,{x^{j'}}_{,p}+
 +
{x^{j'}}_{,p}{x^{m}}_{,i'}{x^{n}}_{,k'}
 +
\;{\Gamma^{p}}_{mn},
 +
\end{equation}
 +
or in expanded notation
 +
\begin{equation}\label{GammaTransformFull}
 +
{{\Gamma'}^{\,j}}_{ik}=
 +
\frac{\partial^{2}x^{p}}
 +
{\partial {x}^{\,i'}\partial {x}^{\,k'}}
 +
\frac{\partial x'^j}{\partial x^p}
 +
+\frac{\partial {x}^{\,j'}}{\partial x^{p}}
 +
\frac{\partial x^{m}}{\partial {x}^{\,i'}}
 +
\frac{\partial {x}^{\,n}}{\partial {x}^{\,k'}}
 +
{\Gamma^{p}}_{mn}.
 +
\end{equation}
 +
 
 +
Let the value of $\Gamma^{i}_{kl}$ at a given point $X$ be $\tilde{\Gamma}^{i}_{kl}=\tilde{\Gamma}^{i}_{lk}$. Then we can move the coordinate origin to $X$ and make the following coordinate transformation:
 +
\begin{align}\label{LocalGeodesic}
 +
x^{i'}&=x^{i}-{\textstyle\frac{1}{2}}
 +
\tilde{\Gamma}^{i}_{kl}x^{k}x^{l};\\
 +
{x^{i'}}_{,n}&=\delta^{i}_{n}-
 +
\tilde{\Gamma}^{i}_{kn}x^{k};\nonumber\\
 +
{x^{i'}}_{,n,m}&=-\tilde{\Gamma}^{i}_{mn}.\nonumber
 +
\end{align}
 +
At the point $x=x'=0$ then ${x^{i'}}_{,j}=\delta^{i}_{j}$, and therefore ${x^{i}}_{,j'}=\delta^{i}_{j}$, so the considered transformation preserves tensor components at the origin.
 +
 
 +
Substituting the derivatives into the transformation law for $\Gamma$ (\ref{GammaTransformFull}), we obtain the connection coefficients in $X$ in the new reference frame:
 +
\[\tilde{\Gamma}^{i'}_{k'l'}=
 +
\delta^{m}_{k'}\delta^{n}_{l'}\delta^{i'}_{p}
 +
\tilde{\Gamma}^{p}_{mn}-
 +
\delta^{i'}_{p}\tilde{\Gamma}^{p}_{k'l'}=
 +
\tilde{\Gamma}^{i'}_{k'l'}
 +
-\tilde{\Gamma}^{i'}_{k'l'}= 0.\]
 +
 
 +
Thus for any given point $X$ we can always bring the metric in the point to the diagonal form and then carry out the above coordinate transformation, turning to zero the connection coefficients. This frame, in which the metric tensor differs from $\eta_{\mu\nu}=diag(1,-1,-1,-1)$ only in second derivatives, is called the locally inertial frame, or locally geodesic frame. Its existence is very useful for calculations, as will be seen in problem[[#equ_oto6a|see problem]]</p>
 
   </div>
 
   </div>
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 21:25, 28 May 2012


Equations of General Relativity

I have thought seriously about this question,
and have come to the conclusion that
what I have to say cannot reasonably be conveyed
without a certain amount of mathematical notation
and the exploration of genuine mathematical concepts.

Roger Penrose
The Road to Reality


Problem 1.

Consider a spacetime with diagonal metric \[ds^2=g_{00}(dx^{0})^2 + g_{11}(dx^{1})^2 +g_{22}(dx^{2})^{2}+g_{33}(dx^{3})^{2}.\] Find the explicit expressions for the intervals of proper time and spatial length, and for the 4-volume. Show that the invariant $4$-volume is given by \[\sqrt{-g}\;d^{4}x\equiv \sqrt{-g}\;dx^{0}dx^{1}dx^{2}dx^{3},\] where $g=\det(g_{\mu\nu})$.


Problem 2.

Let there be an observer with $4$-velocity $u^{\mu}$. Show that the energy of a photon with $4$-wave vector $k^\mu$ that he registers is $u^{\mu}k_{\mu}$, and the energy of a massive particle with $4$-momentum $p^{\mu}$ is $u^{\mu}p_{\mu}$.


Problem 3.

The covariant derivative (or connection) $\nabla_{\mu}$ is a tensorial generalization of partial derivative of a vector field $A^{\mu}(x)$ in the curved space-time. It's action on vectors is defined as \begin{equation}\label{nabla} \nabla_{\mu}A^{\nu}=\partial_{\mu}A^{\nu}+ {\Gamma^{\nu}}_{\lambda\mu}A^{\lambda};\qquad \nabla_{\mu}A_{\nu}=\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}- {\Gamma^{\rho}}_{\nu\mu}A_{\rho}, \end{equation} where matrices ${\Gamma^{i}}_{jk}$ are called the connection coefficients, so that $\nabla_{\mu}A^{\nu}$ and $\nabla_{\mu}A_{\nu}$ are tensors. The connection used in GR is symmetric in lower indices (${\Gamma^{\lambda}}_{\mu\nu}= {\Gamma^{\lambda}}_{\nu\mu}$) and compatible with the metric $\nabla_{\lambda}g_{\mu\nu}=0$. It is called the Levi-Civita's connection, and the corresponding coefficients ${\Gamma^{\lambda}}_{\mu\nu}$ the Christoffel symbols. The action on tensors is defined through linearity and Leibniz rule. Express the Christoffel symbols through the metric tensor.


Problem 4.

Derive the transformation rule for matrices ${\Gamma^{\lambda}}_{\mu\nu}$ under coordinate transformations. Show that for any given point of spacetime there is a coordinate frame, in which ${\Gamma^{\lambda}}_{\mu\nu}$ are equal to zero in this point. It is called a locally inertial, or locally geodesic frame.


Problem 5.

Free falling particles' worldlines in General Relativity are \textit{geodesics} of the spacetime--- i.e the curves $x^{\mu}(\lambda)$ with tangent vector $u^{\mu}=dx^{\mu}/d\lambda$, such that covariant derivative of the latter along the curve equals to zero: \[u^{\mu}\nabla_{\mu}u^{\nu}=0.\]

In a (pseudo-)Euclidean space the geodesics are straight lines. Obtain the general equation of geodesics in terms of the connection coefficients. Show that the quantity $u^{\mu}u_{\mu}$ is conserved along the geodesic.


Problem 6.

Consider the action for a massive particle of the form \[S_{AB}=-mc\int_{A}^{B} ds,\quad\text{where}\quad ds=\sqrt{g_{\mu\nu}dx^{\mu}dx^{\nu}}\] and derive the geodesic equation from the principle of least action. Find the canonical $4$-momentum of a massive particle and the energy of a photon.


Problem 7.

A Killing vector field, or just Killing vector, is a vector field $K^{\mu}(x)$, such that infinitesimal coordinate transformation $x\to x'+\varepsilon K $ (where $\varepsilon\to 0$) leaves the metric invariant in the sense\footnote{That is, let $g_{\mu\nu}(x)$ be the components of the metric at some point $A$ in the original frame. Then $g'_{\mu\nu}(x)$ are the components of the metric in the new frame, taken at point $A'$, which has the same coordinates in the new frame as $A$ had in the old frame.} \[g_{\mu\nu}(x)=g'_{\mu\nu}(x).\] A Killing vector defines a one-parametric symmetry group of the metric tensor, called isometry.

Show that a Killing vector obeys the equation \[\nabla_{\mu}K_{\nu}+\nabla_{\nu}K_{\mu}=0,\] called the Killing equation.


Problem 8.

Suppose there is a coordinate frame, in which the metric does not depend on one of the coordinates $x^{k}$. Show that in this case the vectors $\partial_{k}$ constitute the Killing vector field, and that the inverse is also true: if there is a Killing vector, we can construct such a coordinate frame.


Problem 9.

Prove that if $K^{\mu}$ is a Killing vector, the quantity $K^{\mu}u_{\mu}$ is conserved along a geodesic with tangent vector $u^{\mu}$.


Problem 10.

The Riemann curvature tensor ${R^{i}}_{klm}$ can be defined through the so-called Ricci identity, written for arbitrary $4$-vector $A^i$: \[\nabla_{m}\nabla_{l}A^{i}-\nabla_{l}\nabla_{m}A^{i} ={R^{i}}_{klm}A^{k}.\] Express ${R^{i}}_{klm}$ in terms of the Christoffel symbols. Show that the Ricci tensor \[R_{km}={R^{l}}_{klm}\] is symmetric.


Problem 11.

Prove the differential Bianchi identity for the curvature tensor: \begin{equation}\label{BianchiId} \nabla_{i}{R^{j}}_{klm}+\nabla_{l}{R^{j}}_{kmi} +\nabla_{m}{R^{j}}_{kil}=0, \end{equation} and show that \[\nabla_{i}R^{i}_{j}=\tfrac{1}{2}\partial_{j}R.\]


Problem 12.

The energy-momentum tensor in General Relativity is defined through the variational derivative of the action for matter \[S_{m}[g^{\mu\nu},\psi] =\frac{1}{c}\int d^{4}x\sqrt{-g} \;L_{m}(g^{\mu\nu},\psi)\] with respect to metric $g^{\mu\nu}$: \[\delta_{g}S=\tfrac{1}{2}\int d^{4}x\sqrt{-g}\; \delta g^{\mu\nu}T_{\mu\nu}.\] Here $L_{m}$ is the Lagrange function for the matter fields $\psi$. Show that for the cases of a massless scalar field and electromagnetic field the above definition reduces to the usual one.


Problem 13.

The full action consists of the action for matter, discussed in the previous problem, and the action for the gravitational field $S_{g}$: \[S=S_{g}+S_{m};\qquad\text{where}\quad S_{g}=-\frac{c^{3}}{16\pi G}\int d^{4}x\sqrt{-g}\;R,\] $R=R^{i}_{i}=g^{ik}R_{ik}$ is scalar curvature, $G$ is the gravitational constant. Starting from the variational principle, derive the Einstein-Hilbert equations\footnote{Also called Einstein field equations, or just Einstein equation (either in singular or plural); the action $S_{g}$ is referred to as Hilbert or Einstein-Hilbert action.} for the gravitational field \begin{equation}\label{EinsteinHilbetEq} R_{\mu\nu}-\tfrac{1}{2}Rg_{\mu\nu} =\frac{8\pi G}{c^4}T_{\mu\nu}. \end{equation}


Problem 14.

Show that the Einstein's equation can be presented in the following form \[R_{\mu\nu} = \frac{8\pi G}{c^4} \left( T_{\mu\nu}-\tfrac{1}{2}T g_{\mu\nu}\right), \quad\text{where}\quad T=T^{\mu}_{\mu}.\] % NEW Show that it leads to the energy-momentum conservation law for matter \[\nabla_{\mu}T^{\mu\nu}=0.\] Does it mean the energy and momentum of matter are actually conserved in general?