Difference between revisions of "The role of curvature in the dynamics of the Universe"
(→Problem 5.) |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<div class="NavHead">solution</div> | <div class="NavHead">solution</div> | ||
<div style="width:100%;" class="NavContent"> | <div style="width:100%;" class="NavContent"> | ||
− | <p style="text-align: left;"></p> | + | <p style="text-align: left;">In this case the first Friedman equation takes the form |
+ | \[\left(\frac{\dot a}{a}\right)^2 | ||
+ | =\frac{1}{a^2}\] | ||
+ | therefore $a\sim t$ and thus $\rho(t) =\rho_{0}( t_{0}/t )^3$.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 22: | Line 25: | ||
<div class="NavHead">solution</div> | <div class="NavHead">solution</div> | ||
<div style="width:100%;" class="NavContent"> | <div style="width:100%;" class="NavContent"> | ||
− | <p style="text-align: left;"></p> | + | <p style="text-align: left;">The contribution of curvature to $H^{2}$ (the first Friedman equation) is $\sim a^{-2}$, that of non-relativistic matter is $\sim a^{-3}$, of radiation $\sim a^{-4}$. Therefore for sufficiently small $a$, i.e. close enough to the Big Bang, the curvature term can be neglected.</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 36: | Line 39: | ||
<div class="NavHead">solution</div> | <div class="NavHead">solution</div> | ||
<div style="width:100%;" class="NavContent"> | <div style="width:100%;" class="NavContent"> | ||
− | <p style="text-align: left;"></p> | + | <p style="text-align: left;">The first Friedman equation is often written as |
+ | \[H^2 = \frac{8\pi G}{3}\rho - \frac{k}{a^2}.\] | ||
+ | Dividing both sides by $H^2$ and rewriting it in terms of | ||
+ | \[\Omega = \frac{\rho }{\rho _{cr}}, | ||
+ | \:\rho _{cr} = \frac{8\pi G}{3H^2},\] | ||
+ | we get | ||
+ | \[\frac{k}{a^2 H^2}=\Omega - 1.\] | ||
+ | As $a^2H^2>0$ and $k$ can only, by definition, take values $-1, 0, 1$, | ||
+ | \[k = \mbox{sign}\left(\Omega-1\right).\] | ||
+ | On the other hand, taking the absolute value of the same equation, for the present moment we get | ||
+ | \begin{equation}\label{a-H-Om} | ||
+ | a_{0}=\frac{H_{0}^{-1}}{\sqrt{|\Omega_0 -1|}}. | ||
+ | \end{equation}</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 51: | Line 66: | ||
<div class="NavHead">solution</div> | <div class="NavHead">solution</div> | ||
<div style="width:100%;" class="NavContent"> | <div style="width:100%;" class="NavContent"> | ||
− | <p style="text-align: left;"></p> | + | <p style="text-align: left;">The result of the previous problem (\ref{a-H-Om}), on restoring the speed of light $c$ by dimensionality, straightforwardly gives us |
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | a_{0}&>7.5\cdot cH_{0}^{-1} | ||
+ | \quad\text{for}\quad k<0;\\ | ||
+ | a_{0}&>12.5\cdot cH_{0}^{-1} | ||
+ | \quad\text{for}\quad k>0. | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | There is no upper bound, as the observational data does not exclude (or rather, tends to imply) the possibility of a spatially flat Universe, with $a_{0}\to\infty$.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 70: | Line 92: | ||
<div class="NavHead">solution</div> | <div class="NavHead">solution</div> | ||
<div style="width:100%;" class="NavContent"> | <div style="width:100%;" class="NavContent"> | ||
− | <p style="text-align: left;"></p> | + | <p style="text-align: left;">The first Friedman equation can be expressed as |
+ | \[\Omega - 1 = \frac{k}{a^2 H^2}.\] | ||
+ | As $a(t)\sim t^{2/[3(1+w)]}$ (see problem \ref{dyn12}), then $H\sim 1/t$ and | ||
+ | \[\Omega-1 \sim k\;t^{\frac{2}{3}\frac{1+3w}{1+w}}.\] | ||
+ | Finally, | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''a)''' \[\Omega-1\sim k t^{2/3};\] | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''b)''' \[\Omega-1\sim k t.\]</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 99: | Line 129: | ||
<div class="NavHead">solution</div> | <div class="NavHead">solution</div> | ||
<div style="width:100%;" class="NavContent"> | <div style="width:100%;" class="NavContent"> | ||
− | <p style="text-align: left;"></p> | + | <p style="text-align: left;">Dividing the first Friedman equation by the second one, we obtain the condition for the accelerated expansion in the form |
+ | \[\frac{1}{1 + 3w} | ||
+ | \left(1 - \frac{k}{8\pi G a^{2}\rho}\right) < 0.\] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Then we immediately see that | ||
+ | \begin{itemize} | ||
+ | \item For a spatially flat or open Universe ($k\leq 0$) accelerated expansion corresponds to $w\leq -1/3$. | ||
+ | \item For a spatially closed Universe the expansion is accelerating if the following conditions hold: | ||
+ | \[\left\{\begin{array}{l} | ||
+ | 1+3w>0;\\ \rho>(8\pi G a^2)^{-1}; | ||
+ | \end{array}\right.\qquad\text{or}\qquad | ||
+ | \left\{\begin{array}{l} | ||
+ | 1+3w<0\\ \rho<(8\pi G a^2)^{-1}. | ||
+ | \end{array}\right.\] | ||
+ | \end{itemize} | ||
+ | In both variants the first inequality is the restriction on pressure, and the second one on the spatial curvature.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 20:02, 19 July 2012
Problem 1.
Derive $\rho(t)$ in a spatially open Universe filled with dust for the epoch when the curvature term in the first Friedman equation is dominating.
In this case the first Friedman equation takes the form \[\left(\frac{\dot a}{a}\right)^2 =\frac{1}{a^2}\] therefore $a\sim t$ and thus $\rho(t) =\rho_{0}( t_{0}/t )^3$.
Problem 2.
Show that in the early Universe the curvature term is negligibly small.
The contribution of curvature to $H^{2}$ (the first Friedman equation) is $\sim a^{-2}$, that of non-relativistic matter is $\sim a^{-3}$, of radiation $\sim a^{-4}$. Therefore for sufficiently small $a$, i.e. close enough to the Big Bang, the curvature term can be neglected.
Problem 3.
Show that $k =\text{sign}(\Omega-1)$ and express the current value of the scale factor $a_{0}$ through the observed quantities $\Omega_{0}$ and $H_{0}$.
The first Friedman equation is often written as \[H^2 = \frac{8\pi G}{3}\rho - \frac{k}{a^2}.\] Dividing both sides by $H^2$ and rewriting it in terms of \[\Omega = \frac{\rho }{\rho _{cr}}, \:\rho _{cr} = \frac{8\pi G}{3H^2},\] we get \[\frac{k}{a^2 H^2}=\Omega - 1.\] As $a^2H^2>0$ and $k$ can only, by definition, take values $-1, 0, 1$, \[k = \mbox{sign}\left(\Omega-1\right).\] On the other hand, taking the absolute value of the same equation, for the present moment we get \begin{equation}\label{a-H-Om} a_{0}=\frac{H_{0}^{-1}}{\sqrt{|\Omega_0 -1|}}. \end{equation}
Problem 4.
Find the lower bound for $a_{0}$, knowing that the Cosmic background (CMB) data combined with SSNIa data imply \[-0.0178<(1-\Omega)<0.0063.\]
The result of the previous problem (\ref{a-H-Om}), on restoring the speed of light $c$ by dimensionality, straightforwardly gives us \begin{align*} a_{0}&>7.5\cdot cH_{0}^{-1} \quad\text{for}\quad k<0;\\ a_{0}&>12.5\cdot cH_{0}^{-1} \quad\text{for}\quad k>0. \end{align*} There is no upper bound, as the observational data does not exclude (or rather, tends to imply) the possibility of a spatially flat Universe, with $a_{0}\to\infty$.
Problem 5.
Fnd the time dependence of $\left|\Omega-1\right|$ in a Universe with domination of
a) radiation,
b) matter.
The first Friedman equation can be expressed as \[\Omega - 1 = \frac{k}{a^2 H^2}.\] As $a(t)\sim t^{2/[3(1+w)]}$ (see problem \ref{dyn12}), then $H\sim 1/t$ and \[\Omega-1 \sim k\;t^{\frac{2}{3}\frac{1+3w}{1+w}}.\] Finally, a) \[\Omega-1\sim k t^{2/3};\] b) \[\Omega-1\sim k t.\]
Problem 6.
Estimate the upper bound of the curvature term in the first Friedman equation during the electroweak epoch ($t\sim 10^{-10}$~s) and the nucleosynthesis epoch ($t\sim 1-200$~s).
Problem 7.
Derive and analyze the conditions of accelerated expansion for a one-component Universe of arbitrary curvature with the component's state parameter S.Kumar arXiv: 1109.6924 $w$.
Dividing the first Friedman equation by the second one, we obtain the condition for the accelerated expansion in the form \[\frac{1}{1 + 3w} \left(1 - \frac{k}{8\pi G a^{2}\rho}\right) < 0.\] Then we immediately see that \begin{itemize} \item For a spatially flat or open Universe (UNIQ-MathJax26-QINU) accelerated expansion corresponds to UNIQ-MathJax27-QINU. \item For a spatially closed Universe the expansion is accelerating if the following conditions hold: UNIQ-MathJax39-QINU \end{itemize} In both variants the first inequality is the restriction on pressure, and the second one on the spatial curvature.