Difference between revisions of "Transverse traceless gauge"
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
From now on we consider only vacuum solutions. Suppose we use the Lorenz gauge. As shown above, we still have the freedom of coordinate transformations with $\square \xi^\mu =0$, which preserve the gauge. So, let us choose some arbitrary (timelike) field $u^\mu$ and, in addition to the Lorenz gauge conditions, demand that the perturbation is also transverse $u^{\mu}\bar{h}_{\mu\nu}=0$ with regard to it plus that it is traceless $\bar{h}^{\mu}_{\mu}=0$. Then $h_{\mu\nu}=\bar{h}_{\mu\nu}$ and we can omit the bars. In the frame of observers with 4-velocity $u^\mu$ the full set of conditions that fix the \emph{transverse traceless (TT) gauge} is then | From now on we consider only vacuum solutions. Suppose we use the Lorenz gauge. As shown above, we still have the freedom of coordinate transformations with $\square \xi^\mu =0$, which preserve the gauge. So, let us choose some arbitrary (timelike) field $u^\mu$ and, in addition to the Lorenz gauge conditions, demand that the perturbation is also transverse $u^{\mu}\bar{h}_{\mu\nu}=0$ with regard to it plus that it is traceless $\bar{h}^{\mu}_{\mu}=0$. Then $h_{\mu\nu}=\bar{h}_{\mu\nu}$ and we can omit the bars. In the frame of observers with 4-velocity $u^\mu$ the full set of conditions that fix the \emph{transverse traceless (TT) gauge} is then | ||
\begin{equation} | \begin{equation} | ||
− | \ | + | \partial_\mu {h^{\mu}}_{\nu}=0,\quad |
h_{0\mu}=0,\quad {h^{\mu}}_{\mu}=0. | h_{0\mu}=0,\quad {h^{\mu}}_{\mu}=0. | ||
\end{equation} | \end{equation} | ||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
Then the remaining Lorenz condition is reduced to | Then the remaining Lorenz condition is reduced to | ||
\begin{align*} | \begin{align*} | ||
− | &0=\ | + | &0=\partial_0 h^0_\nu +\partial_\alpha h^\alpha_\nu ;\\ |
\nu=0:\quad& 0=0;\\ | \nu=0:\quad& 0=0;\\ | ||
− | \nu=\beta:\quad&0= \ | + | \nu=\beta:\quad&0= \partial_{\alpha}{s^{\alpha}}_{\beta}, |
\end{align*} | \end{align*} | ||
so it takes the form | so it takes the form | ||
\begin{equation} | \begin{equation} | ||
− | \ | + | \partial_{\alpha}{s^{\alpha}}_{\beta}=0. |
\end{equation} | \end{equation} | ||
Thus the only remaining non-trivial component of the perturbation is the tensor one (the traceless part) $s_{\alpha\beta}$, and it is transverse, in the sense that for a plane wave solution $s_{\alpha\beta}\sim e^{i\,k_{\mu}x^{\mu}}$ the metric perturbation is transverse with respect to the wave vector: | Thus the only remaining non-trivial component of the perturbation is the tensor one (the traceless part) $s_{\alpha\beta}$, and it is transverse, in the sense that for a plane wave solution $s_{\alpha\beta}\sim e^{i\,k_{\mu}x^{\mu}}$ the metric perturbation is transverse with respect to the wave vector: | ||
Line 163: | Line 163: | ||
\item The gauge transformation for $\bar{h}_{\mu\nu}$ and therefore $A_{\mu\nu}$ is | \item The gauge transformation for $\bar{h}_{\mu\nu}$ and therefore $A_{\mu\nu}$ is | ||
\[A_{\mu\nu}\to A_{\mu\nu}' | \[A_{\mu\nu}\to A_{\mu\nu}' | ||
− | =A_{\mu\nu}-2\ | + | =A_{\mu\nu}-2\partial_{(\mu}\xi_{\nu)} |
− | +\eta_{\mu\nu}\ | + | +\eta_{\mu\nu}\partial_{\lambda}\xi^\lambda,\] |
so | so | ||
\begin{equation} | \begin{equation} | ||
Line 212: | Line 212: | ||
\item in the TT gauge (denoted by the superscript $TT$) | \item in the TT gauge (denoted by the superscript $TT$) | ||
\[R_{0\alpha 0\beta} | \[R_{0\alpha 0\beta} | ||
− | =-\tfrac{1}{2}\ | + | =-\tfrac{1}{2}\partial_0^2 g_{\alpha\beta}^{TT};\] |
\end{enumerate} | \end{enumerate} | ||
[based on Padm p403]. | [based on Padm p403]. | ||
Line 245: | Line 245: | ||
\item In the TT gauge $g_{00}$ and $g_{0\alpha}$ are zero, so in the first order | \item In the TT gauge $g_{00}$ and $g_{0\alpha}$ are zero, so in the first order | ||
\[R_{0\alpha 0\beta}=\frac{1}{2}\big( | \[R_{0\alpha 0\beta}=\frac{1}{2}\big( | ||
− | \ | + | \partial_0 \partial_\beta g_{0\alpha} |
− | +\ | + | +\partial_\alpha \partial_0 g_{0\beta} |
− | -\ | + | -\partial_0 \partial_0 g_{\alpha\beta} |
− | -\ | + | -\partial_\alpha \partial_\beta g_{00}\big) |
− | =-\tfrac12 \ | + | =-\tfrac12 \partial_0^2 g_{\alpha\beta}.\] |
As the curvature tensor is gauge invariant, the last relation allows one to calculate the metric components in the TT gauge $g_{\alpha\beta}^{TT}$ without the prior gauge fixing. | As the curvature tensor is gauge invariant, the last relation allows one to calculate the metric components in the TT gauge $g_{\alpha\beta}^{TT}$ without the prior gauge fixing. | ||
\end{enumerate}</p> | \end{enumerate}</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div></div> | </div></div> |
Revision as of 14:25, 26 December 2012
From now on we consider only vacuum solutions. Suppose we use the Lorenz gauge. As shown above, we still have the freedom of coordinate transformations with $\square \xi^\mu =0$, which preserve the gauge. So, let us choose some arbitrary (timelike) field $u^\mu$ and, in addition to the Lorenz gauge conditions, demand that the perturbation is also transverse $u^{\mu}\bar{h}_{\mu\nu}=0$ with regard to it plus that it is traceless $\bar{h}^{\mu}_{\mu}=0$. Then $h_{\mu\nu}=\bar{h}_{\mu\nu}$ and we can omit the bars. In the frame of observers with 4-velocity $u^\mu$ the full set of conditions that fix the \emph{transverse traceless (TT) gauge} is then \begin{equation} \partial_\mu {h^{\mu}}_{\nu}=0,\quad h_{0\mu}=0,\quad {h^{\mu}}_{\mu}=0. \end{equation}
Simplest solutions of the vacuum wave equation are plane waves \[h_{\mu\nu}=h_{\mu\nu}e^{ik_{\lambda}x^\lambda}.\] Indeed, substitution into $\square h_{\mu\nu}=0$ yields \[k^{\lambda}k_{\lambda}\cdot h_{\mu\nu}=0.\] Thus
- either the wave vector is null $k^{\lambda}k_{\lambda}=0$, which roughly translates as that gravitational waves propagate with the speed of light,
- or $h_{\mu\nu}=0$, which means that in any other (non-TT) coordinate frame, in which metric perturbation is non-zero, it is due to the oscillating coordinate system, while the true gravitational field vanishes.
\end{itemize}
Contents
Problem 1: Transverse traceless (TT) gauge
Rewrite the gauge conditions for the TT and Lorenz gauge \begin{enumerate} \item in terms of scalar, vector and tensor decomposition; \item in terms of the metric perturbation for the plane wave solution UNIQ-MathJax58-QINU with wave vector UNIQ-MathJax10-QINU directed along the UNIQ-MathJax11-QINU-axis. \end{enumerate}
\begin{enumerate} \item The two algebraic conditions are \begin{align} 0&=u^{\mu}h_{\mu\nu}=h_{0\nu}=(\Phi,-\mathbf{w});\\ 0&=h^{\mu}_{\mu}=\Phi-6\Psi, \end{align} so we get in the new frame \[\Phi=\Psi=0,\quad \mathbf{w}=0.\] Then the remaining Lorenz condition is reduced to \begin{align*} &0=\partial_0 h^0_\nu +\partial_\alpha h^\alpha_\nu ;\\ \nu=0:\quad& 0=0;\\ \nu=\beta:\quad&0= \partial_{\alpha}{s^{\alpha}}_{\beta}, \end{align*} so it takes the form \begin{equation} \partial_{\alpha}{s^{\alpha}}_{\beta}=0. \end{equation} Thus the only remaining non-trivial component of the perturbation is the tensor one (the traceless part) $s_{\alpha\beta}$, and it is transverse, in the sense that for a plane wave solution $s_{\alpha\beta}\sim e^{i\,k_{\mu}x^{\mu}}$ the metric perturbation is transverse with respect to the wave vector: \[k^{\alpha}s_{\alpha\beta}=0.\] \item Transversality implies $h_{\mu 0}=0$, Lorenz gauge condition that $h_{\mu z}=0$, so the only non-zero components are $h_{xx},h_{yy},h_{xy},h_{yx}$. Of those only two are independent due to symmetry $h_{xy}=h_{yx}$ and tracelessness $h_{xx}+h_{yy}=0$. \end{enumerate}
So any plane-wave solution with $k^{\mu}=(\omega,0,0,k)$ in the $z$-direction in the TT gauge has the form
\begin{equation}
h_{\mu\nu}=\bordermatrix{
~&t&x&y&z\cr
t&0&0&0&0\cr
x&0&h_{+}&h_{\times}&0\cr
y&0&h_{\times}&-h_{+}&0\cr
z&0&0&0&0}e^{ikz-i\omega t},
\end{equation}
or more generally any wave solution propagating in the $z$ direction can be presented as
\begin{align}
h_{\mu\nu}(t,z)&=
\bordermatrix{
~&t&x&y&z\cr
t&0&0&0&0\cr
x&0&1&0&0\cr
y&0&0&-1&0\cr
z&0&0&0&0}h_{+}(t-z)
+\bordermatrix{
~&t&x&y&z\cr
t&0&0&0&0\cr
x&0&0&1&0\cr
y&0&1&0&0\cr
z&0&0&0&0}h_{\times}(t-z)=\\
&=e^{(+)}_{\mu\nu}h_{+}(t-z)
+e^{(\times)}_{\mu\nu}h_{\times}(t-z).
\end{align}
Here $h_{+}$ and $h_\times$ are the amplitudes of the two independent components with linear polarization, and $e^{(\times)}_{\mu\nu},e^{(+)}_{\mu\nu}$ are the corresponding polarization tensors.
Problem 2: Two polarizations
Show that $e^{(\times)}_{\mu\nu}$ and $e^{(+)}_{\mu\nu}$ transform into each other under rotation by $\pi/8$
The two-dimensional transformation matrix $\Phi$ for rotation by $\pi/4$ and the polarization tensors are \[\Phi=(x^{\mu}_{,\nu})=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{pmatrix}1&1\\-1&1 \end{pmatrix},\quad (e^{(+)}_{\mu\nu}) =\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\end{pmatrix},\quad (e^{(\times)}_{\mu\nu}) =\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\1&0\end{pmatrix}.\] In matrix notation the second rank tensor transformation law is $e'=\Phi\Phi e$, and acting twice on each of the polarization vectors we have \begin{align*} \Phi\Phi e^{(+)}&=\frac12 \begin{pmatrix}1&1\\-1&1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}1&1\\-1&1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1 \end{pmatrix} =-\begin{pmatrix}0&+1\\1&0 \end{pmatrix} =-e^{(\times)},\\ \Phi\Phi e^{(\times)}&=\frac12 \begin{pmatrix}1&1\\-1&1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}1&1\\-1&1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}0&+1\\1&0 \end{pmatrix} =+\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1 \end{pmatrix} =+e^{(+)}. \end{align*}
Problem 3: Plane wave TT gauge transformation
Consider the plane wave solution of the wave equation in the Lorenz gauge: \[\bar{h}_{\mu\nu} =A_{\mu\nu}e^{i\,k_{\lambda}x^\lambda}, \quad k^\mu k_\mu =0.\] \begin{enumerate} \item Show that the TT gauge is fixed by the coordinate transformation UNIQ-MathJax31-QINU with \begin{align} \xi_{\mu}&=B_{\mu}e^{ik_\lambda x^\lambda};\\ B_{\lambda} &=-\frac{A_{\mu\nu}l^\mu l^\nu} {8i \omega^4}k_\lambda -\frac{A^{\mu}_{\mu}}{4i\omega^2}l_\lambda +\frac{1}{2i\omega^2}A_{\lambda\mu}l^\mu;\\ &\text{where}\quad k^\mu=(\omega,\mathbf{k}),\quad l^{\mu}=(\omega,-\mathbf{k}). \end{align} [Padm. p \textsection 9.3, p.403 (wrong signs!), also see MTW Ex.35.1 for similar formulation; \emph{the solution can probably be derived if we introduce the null frame $k$ and $l$ (the other two spacial basis vectors are not needed) and look for solution in the form $B=C_1 k+ C_2 l +C_{3} w$.}] \item What is the transformation to the Lorenz gauge for arbitrary gravitational wave in vacuum? \end{enumerate}
\begin{enumerate} \item The gauge transformation for UNIQ-MathJax35-QINU and therefore UNIQ-MathJax36-QINU is UNIQ-MathJax63-QINU so \begin{equation} A_{\mu\nu}\to A_{\mu\nu}' =A_{\mu\nu}-2ik_{(\mu}B_{\nu)} +i\eta_{\mu\nu}k_{\lambda}B^\lambda, \end{equation} and the TT gauge conditions take the form \begin{align} 0&={{A'}^{\mu}}_{\mu}={A^{\mu}}_{\mu}+2ik^\mu B_\mu;\\ 0&={A'}_{0\;\mu}=A_{0\mu}-ik_0 B_{\mu} -ik_\mu B_0 +i\delta^0_\mu \; k_\lambda B^\lambda. \end{align} Also remember that Lorenz gauge implies $k_{\mu}A^{\mu\nu}=0$, thus $k^{\alpha}A_{\alpha\mu}=-\omega A_{0\mu}$, and therefore \begin{equation} l^{\mu}k_{\mu}=2\omega^2,\quad A_{\mu\nu}l^{\mu}=2\omega A_{0\mu},\quad k^{\lambda}B_{\lambda} =-\frac{1}{2i}{A^{\lambda}}_{\lambda}. \end{equation} Plugging this into the gauge conditions, one can see that the first one (tracelessness) is obeyed immediately, and the second one (transversality) after a little bit of more algebra. \item The general first-order vacuum solution of Einstein's equations in the Lorenz gauge can be presented through its spatial Fourier transform (temporal part is integrated over due to fixed dispersion relation) \[h_{\mu\nu}(x)=\int d^{3}k h_{\mu\nu}(\mathbf{k}) e^{ik_{\lambda}x^{\lambda}},\quad\text{with}\quad k^\mu k_\mu =0,\quad\Leftrightarrow\quad k_{0}^{2}\equiv \omega^2 =\mathbf{k}^2.\] Then the TT gauge will be fixed by the coordinate fransformation \[\xi^\mu =\int d^{3}k B^{\mu}[h_{\mu\nu}(\mathbf{k})] e^{ik_{\lambda}x^{\lambda}}.\] Working with individual plane-wave solutions is equivalent to working in the full Fourier space. \end{enumerate}
Problem 3: Curvature of a plane wave
Consider the plane-wave solution, in which \[R_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} =C_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}e^{ik_{\lambda}x^{\lambda}}.\] \begin{enumerate} \item Using the Bianchi identity, show that all components of the curvature tensor can be expressed through UNIQ-MathJax39-QINU; \item Show that in the coordinate frame such that UNIQ-MathJax40-QINU is directed along the UNIQ-MathJax41-QINU-axis the only possible nonzero components are UNIQ-MathJax42-QINU, UNIQ-MathJax43-QINU and UNIQ-MathJax44-QINU, obeying UNIQ-MathJax45-QINU, leaving only two independent non-zero components; \item in the TT gauge (denoted by the superscript UNIQ-MathJax46-QINU) UNIQ-MathJax67-QINU \end{enumerate} [based on Padm p403].
\begin{enumerate} \item The covariant derivatives in the Bianchi identity UNIQ-MathJax68-QINU in the first order can be replaced by partial derivatives. Then for a plane-wave solution UNIQ-MathJax69-QINU By setting UNIQ-MathJax47-QINU we get (UNIQ-MathJax48-QINU for a null vector) UNIQ-MathJax70-QINU and by setting UNIQ-MathJax49-QINU and using the previous result, that UNIQ-MathJax71-QINU \item From vacuum Einstein equations UNIQ-MathJax72-QINU expressing everything through UNIQ-MathJax50-QINU, we get \begin{align} 00:&\quad R_{0\alpha 0\alpha}=0;\\ 0\beta:&\quad k_{\alpha} R_{0\alpha 0\beta}=0;\\ \beta\gamma:&\quad 0=0. \end{align} The $00$ equation translates to the wave being traceless, and the $0\beta$ equation to it being transverse: in the chosen frame \[R_{0x0x}+R_{0y0y}=0,\qquad R_{0z0\alpha}=0.\] \item In the TT gauge $g_{00}$ and $g_{0\alpha}$ are zero, so in the first order \[R_{0\alpha 0\beta}=\frac{1}{2}\big( \partial_0 \partial_\beta g_{0\alpha} +\partial_\alpha \partial_0 g_{0\beta} -\partial_0 \partial_0 g_{\alpha\beta} -\partial_\alpha \partial_\beta g_{00}\big) =-\tfrac12 \partial_0^2 g_{\alpha\beta}.\] As the curvature tensor is gauge invariant, the last relation allows one to calculate the metric components in the TT gauge $g_{\alpha\beta}^{TT}$ without the prior gauge fixing. \end{enumerate}