Let us cite N.Straumann (2002) (arXiv:astro-ph/0203330):
"From Pauli's discussions with Enz and Thellung we know that Pauli estimated the influence of the zero-point energy of the electromagnetic field---cut off at the classical electron radius---on the radius of the Universe, and came to the conclusion that it "could not even reach to the moon":
When, as a student, I heard about this, I checked Pauli's unpublished remark by doing the following little calculation:
In units $\hbar=c=1$ the vacuum energy density of the electromagnetic field is
\[\langle
\rho_{vac}\rangle=\frac{8\pi}{(2\pi)^3}\int\limits_0^{\omega_{max}}
\frac{\omega}{2}\omega^2d\omega=\frac{\omega_{max}^4}{8\pi^2},\]
with
\[\omega_{max}=\frac{2\pi}{\lambda_{min}}=\frac{2\pi m_e}{\alpha},\]
where $m_e$ is the electron mass and $\alpha\simeq1/137$ is the fine structure constant.
Using the results of the first problem of this section, one obtains
\[\Lambda=\frac{4\pi\langle \rho_{vac}\rangle}{M_{Pl}^2}\Rightarrow
R=\frac{1}{\sqrt\Lambda}=\frac{\alpha^2M_{Pl}}{(2\pi)^{2/3}
m_e^2}\simeq31.6\mbox{\it km}.\]
This is indeed less than the distance to the moon.$^*$
$^*$It would be more consistent to use the curvature radius of the static de Sitter solution; the result is the same, up to the factor $\sqrt3$.